In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006, kohscp <[email protected]> writes >All the response is not going convince the management guys. A real life >case of penalty (or some sort of prosecution case) would be more >effective in putting the message across. > >Anyone able to provide cases of it. > While there should be diligence in satisfying all aspects of regulations, such an intense concentration on this matter seems unusual. People are usually more concerned that the safety and EMC performance of the product is beyond reproach. > > > >This bring me to another scenario, if product (size is big enough for >the CE mark) bears CE mark lesser than 5mm, but packaging carries the >correct size CE mark? > >So in such case, how do you view it.
With equanimity. Any regulator that pursued such a matter must be looking for work, and should instead be looking for a job. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
