In message <[email protected]>, dated Fri, 28 Apr 2006, kohscp <[email protected]> writes
>But however, I?ve seen lots of products bearing CE logo which is >definitely lesser than 5mm height. > >Such as some electronic products, toy product and on my desk a >stationary highlighter, all which have CE mark of about 3mm height. > > > >Isn?t this deem not meeting to CE mark logo specs/requirement? Formally, yes, but these requirements for the dimensions of printed characters simply don't work for the very small products that are so widespread these days. The requirement should be deleted or modified, but it almost certainly will not be. I seem to remember a case many years ago where a product with a surface area of about 600 square inches required about 1100 square inches of labelling to be applied. > >Is there any cases of penalty that anyone can provide so that I could >use it to show to our management guys. I hope the regulatory authorities have something more constructive to do. If there were such a case, it would provide grounds for the deletion or modification I mention above. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
