Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved

[Christian M. M. Brady]

On 4/4/01 11:53 PM, "Harry (lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> on 4/4/01 9:15 PM, Dan Crevier at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> The updaters are behaving as intended.  They are designed to be
>> conservative.  If the user has messed with the files, there's no telling
>> what the result of their modifications plus the SR modifications will result
>> in.
> 
> Fair enough - but it doesn't address that this information should be
> conveyed in the associated documentation.

I believe there is mention in the docs that if you have altered the programs
in any way (e.g. names) you need to restore them before running the update.

Cb
cbrady @ tulane.edu
--  
A professor is one who talks in someone else's sleep. 


-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>