Re: SR-1 updater logic could be improved

[Tim Mountford]

Stardate 5/4/01 5:15am, Dan Crevier's log:
> The updaters are behaving as intended.  They are designed to be
> conservative.  If the user has messed with the files, there's no telling
> what the result of their modifications plus the SR modifications will result
> in.

Okay, but as I saw it the SR updater simply moved the old defunct copy to
the trash and replaced it with a new one, no? Ergo the modified app is no
longer an issue. 

(I expect I'm wrong and it really does feel silly arguing the toss about
this as it installed perfectly for me.)

Tim
------------------------------------------
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------------
due to popular demand our website has been
closed down.
http://www.thehappyhouse.co.uk





-- 
To unsubscribe:               <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To search the archives: 
          <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>