On 8/9/06 1:31 AM, "Raul Gutierrez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 7. I've had email and computers long enough to know the most archival format > for anything is plain text. (My entourage database contains very ancient > mail imported from the well to compuserve to eudora to emailer to > entourage...) One of the reasons I think my data has always been accessible > and importable is that as much as possible I keep it as unstyled text. I don't know what all the hue and cry against HTML is all about.. The only excuse is the security concern, if there is any, and if there is I wish someone would explain it to me. I like HTML because I can pick any font I want. In plain text if some one sends me an Email in absurdly small and dull fonts, I'm stuck with their font should I reply, in plain text. With HTML, I can can still change my font in an return (REPLY) letter. Since I'm blind in one eye and can't hardly see in the other, I prefer a larger and/or bolder font, thus I need HTML. JQ -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
