on 12/28/00 7:41 PM, Dave Buyens at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Wouldn't it be better to see what the specs on the Canon are first?
>
> Ok. I guess I'm just tired of shooting film as a PJ, a fact that keeps me
> scanning until all hours of the night and on weekends while competitors
> play.
>
> Let's face it, Nikon hasn't dropped the price of the D1 because it has no
> competition. Hence, in my view, Canon needs a $3,500 camera that matches
> the D1 or a $5-6K body that clearly bests the D1 (like 6 MP with a full size
> CMOS). Otherwise Nikon will only drop the price of the D1 and Canon still
> won't make a dent in Nikon's considerable lead in the PJ industry.
I know what you mean, as a PJ myself. For me one important thing would be a
faster fps rate. Of course what price Canon says doesnt mean thats the
price its going to sell at. I would still prefer the DCS 520 over the D1
personaly (after reading some users reviews of the D1).
I guess we will all just have to wait
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
