>> Julian Loke wrote: ...
>> Has anyone directly compared the AF performance with
>> the same lens mounted on an EOS 3 or EOS 1v, then
>> mounted on something like an EOS 30/Elan 7?

> "Bob Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It may well be true that the central focus spot on an
> Elan II or 7 works better with slow lenses and low
> contrast subjects, but the focus tracking ability of
> the 3 is so much better that I'd never consider using
> my IIe to shoot soccer.  Maybe for birds moving
> parallel to the film plane, that's not an issue.

Hi Bob,

I have not used the Elan II. If we can believe the
advertising, the EOS 30/Elan 7 has better autofocus
tracking than the EOS 50/Elan II.

Devising a consistent way of testing AF tracking is
difficult.

I prefer to leave it to others, like Philip Chong,
to "experiment" shooting an EOS 33 at 4fps while
driving a motorcyle at 120km/h (75mph) on a highway!!!
http://www.camera.canon.com.my/photography/nut/2001iss/nuts58/03.htm

Cheers
Julian Loke

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to