Pierre Bellavance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wow! These are very nice pictures.
Thanks!
> All taken with the 20/2.8?
The pictures fomr Scandinavia, only the sleddog (really close focus) and
the rower (?)
Paris pictures, all except the Louvre, "Dog before barber", "Museum with
sleeping woman" and "Stalingrad"
Tenerife: Both Hermigua pictures, "little green plant", "Parque nacional
del Teide", LAS_CANADAS1.jpg, LOS_ROQUES2.jpg, QUEENSSHOE.jpg,
LAS_CANADAS3.jpg, LAS_CANADAS4.jpg, LAS_CANADAS5.jpg,
TENERIFE_VERGEZICHT3.jpg
So quite a lot :)
> I've made informal tests (8x12s) with both the 20/2.8 and the 20-35/3.5-4.5
> and these have shown the 20/2.8 to be sharper.
Isn't it almost a rule that fixed focus are sharper then zooms (except
maybe some L lenses?!)...
> Sharpness is VERY important for me, so I guess I will be happier with the
> 20/2.8 lens.
I shoot 95% slides and shoot a lot at with tha aperture set to f8!
Another reason (and maybe this is also important for you) is that I one
day will buy a EF200/2.8 which has also a 72mm filter thread. I once was
thinking of replacing my EF28-105 with a EF28-135, and yes this one uses
again a 72mm filter thread! That way my expensive B+W slim (UV & CPOL)
filter can be used...
Bye,
Erwin
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
