>direct comparison, f/2.8 vs f/3.5 is "a little" unfair. It's a 2/3 stop >difference. I believe in Canon-terminology 3.5 is half a stop slower than 2.8. Just like 4 - 4.5 - 5.6. If it really matters. Vesa _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Vicente
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Julian Loke
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Willem-Jan Markerink
- FD vs EOS Robert Meier
- Re: FD vs EOS Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Erwin Harkink
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Pierre Bellavance
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Erwin Harkink
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Vesa Perala
- Re: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS f stops Julian Loke
- Re: EOS f stops Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS f stops F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS f stops Julian Loke
- Re: EOS f stops Julian Loke
- EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 (last mes... Pierre Bellavance
- RE: EOS 20/2.8 vs 20-35/3.5-4.5 Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
