>From time to time I hear from people swearing on the
high quality of old lenses. I wonder if these claims
are really true? I agree that the heavy lenses built
with metal and glass make a more solid impression then
the light lenses made of plastic. But what about the
optical quality? I would expect that although the
newer lenses are cheaper the new designs, techniques
and even bigger mass-market can make up for a lot. So
for example how does an FD50/1.4 compare to an
EOS50/1.4. Or a FD70-210 macro to an EOS70-210/3.5-4.5
or EOS75-300IS?
Robert
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email at your own domain with Yahoo! Mail.
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
