"F. Craig Callahan" wrote: > > traded in a 3 because they found it "too complicated"? Or for a 1vs? No, I'm not trying to start an unfounded rumor about a new EOS camera (1vs)--I had begun that sentence in the plural, and neglected to change the 1v back to singular when I changed the rest of the sentence. So everyone can relax. :-) fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression Frederico Samarane
- 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Gabriel Massip Fons
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression... Jim Davis
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impres... Hugo G�vert
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impres... Gabriel Massip Fons
- RE: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Chuck Skinner
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impres... Daniel ROCHA
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impres... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Gary Lim
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Jim Davis
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 ... Skip
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 ... Bob Meyer
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X... Andreas W
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X... Karen Nakamura
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X... Ken Durling
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X... Tom Pfeiffer
- Re[2]: 3 Old? (was: EOS ... Dieter Henkel
- Re[2]: 3 Old? (was: EOS ... Neil K.
