----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Meyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > According to Canon, it's because they couldn't fit the > 45 pt AF, ECF and a built in diopter all at the same > time (using the technology they had during the design > phase), and more pros want the diopter than ECF Are you sure it was the diopter? From what I heard (a long time ago, just around the release), the main reason for the lack of ECF was the 100% viewfinder. /Andreas * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Hugo G�vert
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Gabriel Massip Fons
- RE: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Chuck Skinner
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Daniel ROCHA
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) F. Craig Callahan
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) F. Craig Callahan
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Gary Lim
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression) Jim Davis
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression... Skip
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impression... Bob Meyer
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my impres... Andreas W
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Karen Nakamura
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Ken Durling
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Tom Pfeiffer
- Re[2]: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my... Dieter Henkel
- Re[2]: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my... Neil K.
- EOS ECF (was Re[3]: 3 Old?) Dieter Henkel
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Gary Kaplan
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Kim
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... Ken Durling
- Re: 3 Old? (was: EOS 5 X 3 X 30 my im... F. Craig Callahan
