At 08:54 AM 04/17/2001, you wrote: >I am planning to buy a 100-400 USM IS lens, and need something shorter as >well. Somebody sugested the 28 - 105 IS, but I am concerned about the >optical quality of such a lens. How bad is it realy (concerning the comment >below). For the record, the IS is the 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS EF (USM). The 28~105 is the non-IS 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 USM EF, of which there are two versions which differ in appearance but not in design or performance. -- regards, Henry Posner Director of Sales and Training B&H Photo-Video, and Pro-Audio Inc. http://www.bhphotovideo.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Thomas Bantel
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Herman
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Tom Pfeiffer
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Skip
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Thomas Bantel
- EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... Ken Durling
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... lightwriter
- Sigma 70-200 and EOS A2e Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- Sigma 70-200 and EOS A2e Jose Maria Farfaglia
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice pl... lightwriter
- RE: EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Icoz, Evrim
- EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
- EOS Re: Quality optics advice please BlueSky
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice please YEGEY
- Re: EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Bill Jameson
- EOS Re: Quality optics advice please Henry Posner/B&H Photo-Video
