> I have a yen to own a Canon 17-35mm L lens, however I believe that the
price
> is greater than a yen, actually it's about �1,100 sterling over here.
>
> Anyone using this objective may care to offer an opinion, and in addition
it
> may be possible for someone to comment on the Sigma equivalent which is
the
> merest fraction of the cost of a Canon....oh dear, oh dear, I really
> shouldn't have said that should I?
>
> Richard Corbett
Just wanted to say, that unless you really really need to go to 17mm,
the Canon EF 20-35 USM is a fine lens. It's not what I'd call cheap, but
it's reasonable compared to the 17-35 and scores perhaps even better in
sharpness. I've got it, and love it. I've heard the Sigma is also a good
lens, but, it's not a Canon lens, and I definitely like to stick to Canon
myself.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
