>heard anybody ever having any problems with plasic mounts? I've not. I
>could see a problem with EF 400 f/2.8 having a plasic mount, but not
>really with the 50 f/1.8. But if you are worried, then just go ahead and
>get the 50 f/1.4. That's definitely better build (the mount is only a
>small part of the lens), and is a little bit faster.
Or maybe even better to get the second hand original EF50/1.8 ("mk I").
vesa
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
