Reminds me of three-strip Cinerama. But seriously, given a stitched file on the one hand and a digital camera of comparable quality that could capture the image in one shot, would there be:
1. no difference whatsoever. 2. so little difference the for a practial matter there is no difference. 3. no visible difference. 4. visible difference, but acceptable. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Loke > Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2001 8:59 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS photographing paintings > > > You guys are still using "silver-based" thinking, where you make > the reproduction in one shot. > > If instead you used the D30 to take a NUMBER of shots that SCAN > the surface, it would be possible to reconstruct a composite > MOSAIC using software. The MOSAIC could have arbitrary resolution, > depending on how many pictures you were prepared to take. > > To get 18x24" at 300dpi would require 16 pictures with overlap: > 4 rows and 4 columns. The stitched file would be over 100Mb in > size. > > Cheers > Julian Loke * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
