[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gosh, I have the opportunity to bid on a few aerial jobs here....and I
> was thinking my 70-200 2.8L or the 28-70 would do the job with a fast
> shutter speed....do you think that an IS lens is NECESSARY for aerial
> work? I'm yet to do any, so maybe the plane shakes more than I remember
> light aircraft shaking....
>
> Rich
>
Way back in the 70's when there was an energy "crisis" I knew a guy that
took aerial photos of buildings. They were Infrared photos that showed heat
leakage.
He bought a thing that was about the size of a beer can with mounting plates
on the 'top' and 'bottom' and a power connector that supplied some dc
voltage. The "beer can" had a gyroscope setup in a nitrogen atmosphere. It
took a while for the gyros to get up to speed but when they were you could
one handedly hand hold a 400mm lens.
I wonder how IS compares to that setup?
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have any film.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
