I have not used the 1d, but I do have a D-30 since October last year. I use it for at least 1/2 of my work. I just got some 12x18's printed on photo paper from a lab that does direct from digital prints to regular photographic paper...these photos are stunning. Film would not have looked better, may even have been worse. There is no grain with the digital, and the transition and tone of the images is awesome. No fragmenting from the size of the enlargement....you can count the individual hairs on the models head. I was blown away when I saw the images...and these were not even full frame...I had cropped in slightly on the original file!
The more I use the D-30 the less need I see to use my film cameras. -- Harrison McClary Harrison McClary Photography http://www.mcclary.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] Once upon a time Gunars Smerlins wrote: >My opinion is that talking about film and lens resolutions in terms of pairs >of lines/mm is wrong, we have to remember that film and lens are analog >devices. > >I think that 1D is great camera, but you can't compare it with film cameras, >not yet, at least. Film and digital cameras are for different purposes. If >this, great digital camera suits your needs, then buy it! * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
