> > Why do we have 4000dpi scanners then? > > To record film grain rather than living with interpolation > artefacts. Compare to my interpolation tests at > http://www.photoquack.de/tutorials/ed30.htm > > > THere is noticable difference between a scan with > > 2400 dpi and 4000dpi... > > Right. Which is more due to the scanner.
That does not really explain why I see better resolution when I scan with 4000dpi, or drum scanners. I have known your site for a while but it does not explain a simple practical test, we can see more if we scan at 4000dpi then 2400 dpi... I am not seeing film grain either! cheers, -e * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
