"Icoz, Evrim" wrote: > Why do we have 4000dpi scanners then? THere is noticable difference between > a scan with 2400 dpi and 4000dpi... Also, do not forget that you have to > account for all three of R,G and B.
I have both the Nikon 2700 and 4000 scanners. I do not think there is "noticeable" difference between the two. Only in very large prints can you see noticeable difference. Up to 11x14, there is no difference in my opinion, unless you examine with a high power magnifying glass. If you print a 13x19 print and compare side by side, at normal viewing distance, you can tell a difference. Ray Amos -- All outgoing mail is Virus scanned by Norton 2002 Anti Virus * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
