> Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:47:27 +0100 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS 1d compared to scanned film > > Thanks for your answer! But isn't this a > theoretical approach?
In part, yes, because the nature of the subject plays a role as well. Shoot organic forms suchas in a portrait and digital performs far better than with geometrical repeated patterns. > What I'm interested in, is a real-life comparison: The same > scenery, photographed using the same lens on both a > conventional EOS and a 1d, followed by a scan of the > film on a film scanner like a Nikon Coolscan IV. The resolution of the scanner can't add more to the picture than the lens resolution allows to record. > You say that the 1d delivers the same quality as a > consumer class zoom lens. Would my EOS 5 and EF 28-105, > using Fuji Superia 200, followed by a scan > using a Nikon LS-30 be in the same league as a 1d? In memory of what my LS-30 delivers (crappy thing), I'd favor the EOS-1D in this race. > Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 10:14:29 -0800 > From: "Icoz, Evrim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: EOS 1d compared to scanned film > > Why do we have 4000dpi scanners then? To record film grain rather than living with interpolation artefacts. Compare to my interpolation tests at http://www.photoquack.de/tutorials/ed30.htm > THere is noticable difference between a scan with > 2400 dpi and 4000dpi... Right. Which is more due to the scanner. > Also, do not forget that you have to > account for all three of R,G and B. Also true. This is why I stated: > > Note: These are real megapixels. Calculating up and > > down interpolation success and loss, a 3 megpixel > > camera will resolve the equivalent of slightly over > > 2 megapixels (two thirds) as a rule of thumb. -- Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ja, eben. F�ngt mit Sat an und h�rt mit Ire auf. :) Uih, voll drauf ausgerutscht! Wie peinlich... :-) * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
