I am not really talking about prints at all, I am talking about actual digital files. The reason is that it was claimed that beyond 2400 dpi you should not really see any difference. I do not agree to that. When you print, you lose information.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Ray Amos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 2:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: EOS 1d compared to scanned film > > > "Icoz, Evrim" wrote: > > > Why do we have 4000dpi scanners then? THere is noticable > difference between > > a scan with 2400 dpi and 4000dpi... Also, do not forget > that you have to > > account for all three of R,G and B. > > I have both the Nikon 2700 and 4000 scanners. I do not think there is > "noticeable" difference between the two. Only in very large > prints can you see > noticeable difference. Up to 11x14, there is no difference > in my opinion, > unless you examine with a high power magnifying glass. If > you print a 13x19 > print and compare side by side, at normal viewing distance, > you can tell a > difference. Ray Amos > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
