Thomas Bantel wrote:
> Peter, which Tamron 28-105 f/2.8 are you talking about? Is it the
> Tamron AF 28-105 f/2.8 LD Aspherical IF lens? If so, a first glance
> at Photodos test results would tell another story. Now, I'm not a
> big fan of Photodo ratings, but those MTF values are too low for a
> good lens, IMHO. The Canon seems light years ahead.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------
Yes, but why then would Fujifilm chose it for a prime lens on their flagship
digital SLR? They could have gone with a Nikon optic.
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
