On Thursday, January 29, 2004, at 06:51AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Based on the links on the www.dpreview.com site: > >Interesting to note the new EF70-300 DO lens is NOT an L lens (looks like >plastic barrel construction). The 400/4 DO isn't an L lens either. >Also interesting to note the new EF28-300L is NOT compatible with the Canon >teleconverters, I wonder if this has to do with protruding rear element >again? And if so would the 3rd party pro grade teleconverters work? This looks like an update to the 35-350 zoom. The wide end is more useful than the telephoto end. Yes, the rear element is in the way. Besides, you really don't want to use it with a 2x converter. -- John Chennavasin | This article contains material which may inform and [EMAIL PROTECTED] | may be quoted, printed, forwarded, or redistributed www.fobpro.com | as long as the original attribution remains intact. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
