At 5:32 PM -0800 3/1/04, Henning Wulff wrote:
At 8:29 AM +0900 3/2/04, Jim Davis Nature Photography wrote:
Bob Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:


That said, the 100-400 + 2xII is pushing the edges of acceptable. Put in on a tripod, stop down a couple of stops, and you'll get images that are usable. But wide open you'll find things pretty soft.

And therein lies the problem.


Even at ISO 800 on a sunny day, I'm shooting wide open at f11, at a
mere 1/125th of a second. And that's just not fast enough for me, even
with IS.

I have got a few usable images using the 100-400 + 2xII. But nothing I
couldn't have got using a 1.4x and cropping a bit.

Here is a crop from a picture shot on 100ISO film in an EOS3 with the 100-400 with 1.4x at 1/8 sec handheld wide open of a Vermilion Flycatcher 4 years ago or so. This is the best shot of 3 that I managed before it took off. It's not perfectly sharp, but not far off what I can get with a two tripod setup with a 509 and 320 Gitzo.


This combination I still find useable, but the 2x disappoints.

Sorry, forgot the link:


http://www.archiphoto.com/Recent/VermFly.jpg

--
   *            Henning J. Wulff
  /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
 /###\   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to