James B.Davis wrote: > > I'd bet it would be more, but I'd pay more for a Canon. The Sigma is > only priced so high because of no competition. ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Jim, There is that other digital camera, Nikon. They have a 12-24mm but it costs about $1050. So there is competition, but Sigma was smart and built theirs at about 40% less. Test results in Pop Photo show it to bea very sharp lens and considering the price, a steal. Yeah, I know there are many who don't like Sigma, but so be it. Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
