On Tuesday August 17 2004 7:30 pm, Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote: > James B.Davis wrote: > > I'd bet it would be more, but I'd pay more for a Canon. The Sigma is > > only priced so high because of no competition. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Jim, > > There is that other digital camera, Nikon. They have a 12-24mm but it costs > about $1050. So there is competition, but Sigma was smart and built theirs > at about 40% less. Test results in Pop Photo show it to bea very sharp lens > and considering the price, a steal. Yeah, I know there are many who don't > like Sigma, but so be it.
Right on both counts. :) Fred -- "Running Windows on a Pentium is like getting a Porsche but only being able to drive it in reverse with the handbrake on." * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
