> I recently bought myself the 20mm f/2.8 from Canon. That works out to > like 32mm on a regular camera. It is a wider than what I was trying for > (my old Nikon 995 was like 38mm wide equivalent) but I'm not > dissappointed. What is really missing are pixels. I'm currently playing > with the panorama software from the Gigapixel guy, and putting serious > thought into a Panasaurus. In a way, this all goes back to my tripod > issues.
Panasaurus looks a bit flimsy to me, considering that it is plastic, but I don't have any personal experience with it. I do have experience with the Kaidan KIWI-L pano head, and it is not strong enough for a standard setup such as 10D, BG-ED3 and 17 35L, even though it is metal. Bouncy big time. I need to use timer release in order to minimize vibrations. Things get worse when a 550 is added to the mix. This is in part why it takes me 30+ (!) minutes to take one lousy 360. Perhaps I should just build a custom head. What is everybody else using? Lars -- .~. Lars Michael /V\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] /(_)\ http://www.larsmichael.com/ ^^ ^^ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
