On Mon, 15 Jan 2007 12:12:38 -0500, Bob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote/replied to:
>With the current camera technology increases, the age of the 20D, and >more full frame digicams maybe in the near future I would go with the >24-70 . Pairing with the 10-22 would give you great flexibility. > >Now, the 10-22 is an S lens which limits the bodies it can be used on >and at $700 +/- that could be a factor. I don't know what the resale >value would be if you get a full framer and want to sell it. > >Another lens that I might add to the conversation is the EF 24-105 f/4 L >IS. Cost is similar to the 24-70 but while it is f/4. it goes out to >105mm and has IS. > > >I have the older 28-70 f/2.8 L and am considering the 24-105 which is >why I mentioned it. Are we talking about 'walk about travel lenses' here? You guys must be a lot richer than I am because no way I'd take an expensive lens travelling. I still say the EF 28-135 IS is the best bang for the buck in a travel lens. Unfortunately there is no cheap really wide angle for the small sensor cameras, but I have had good luck stitching multiple photos in those instances when I just had to have a wider view. Sure saves lugging along another lens, not to mention buying one. As well, I don't really like extreme wide angle lenses for vacation photos. Sure you get more into the photo, but everything in the frame is just so damned small. Especially anything at a distance. -- Jim Davis, Owner, Eastern Beaver Company: http://easternbeaver.com/ Motorcycle Relay Kits, Modulator Kits, Powerlet, Centech, Posi-Lock, Parts. 1988 K100RS SE ABS in Japan. 1991 ST1100 in America. STOC#6327, IBMWR, KBMW * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
