On 11:59 AM, Fyodorov "Bga" Alexander wrote:
Peter van der Zee пишет:
> maybe something like
> x @name@ y
Again, I'm not convinced this is the way to go myself, just throwing
it out here. The whole proxy overloading thing just seems to "hide"
what's actually going on and overly complicate things. In production,
that's gonna haunt you some day.
This is not the place to be depositing random ideas or half-baked gems.
This is a standards effort, maintaining what has become one of the world's
most important programming languages. ECMA TC39 needs to be extremely
cautious in its improvements and refinements.
So by all means, do the experiment. Implement your idea, and test it as
broadly
as you can. If it proves to have merit, then please bring it back and we may
consider it for inclusion in a future edition.
A standards body should the last place you go to with new ideas, not the
first.
I agree with your concern about unexpected behavior and the other
symptoms of excessive complexity. We must be cautious here as well.
_______________________________________________
es-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
