On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Erik Corry <[email protected]> wrote: > On the concrete proposal I note that the strawman claims this can be > used to implement bignums, but it seems to me there is no way to > implement storage of arbitrary size so that would appear to be > impossible. Am I missing something.
The operator handler could, for example, contain an array of JS ints to represent a bignum. > Another question: As I read the proposal, the dispatch is on the left > hand side of binary operators. Does the proposal have a way for a+b > to work where a is an old-fashioned number and b is a complex? Yes. In this case where a is an old-fashioned number and b is a complex, the radd trap of b is invoked, passing argument a. I've updated the strawman to clarify. - Cormac _______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
