The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it now. Or is anyone still using it?
On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > of svn. > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files >> need to be at the base directory of the package. >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >>> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the trunk. >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? >>> >>> >>> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Joe. >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some >> Licensing >>> >>>>>>> Nits". >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> /Anne >>>>>> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________ >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > >
