Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure though.
Ethan On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > > http://git.apache.org/ > > > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > if others use it, it makes sense to request support > for git. > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete it >> now. >> Or is anyone still using it? >> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out >> > of svn. >> > >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> >> From: Joe Schaefer >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >>> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >> >>> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the >> >>> trunk. >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >>>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe. >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some >> >> Licensing >> >>> >> >>>>>>> Nits". >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> /Anne >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's copyright >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> __________________________________________________ >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >
