Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. Thanks Joe and Daniel.
Ethan On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn > server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do > to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: > > > http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I >> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my >> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure >> though. >> >> Ethan >> >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at >> > >> > http://git.apache.org/ >> > >> > >> > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I >> > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But >> > if others use it, it makes sense to request support >> > for git. >> > >> > >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >> >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete >> >> it >> >> now. >> >> Or is anyone still using it? >> >> >> >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> >> >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs >> >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do >> >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. >> >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git >> >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. >> >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all >> >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested >> >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out >> >> > of svn. >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ----- Original Message ---- >> >> >> From: Joe Schaefer >> >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >> >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >> >> >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >> >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files >> >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >> >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >> >>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >> >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >> >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? >> >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the >> trunk. >> >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. >> >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has >> >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree >> >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >> >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >> >>>>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >> >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> Thanks Joe. >> >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >> >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >> >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some >> >> >> Licensing >> >> >>> >> >> >>>>>>> Nits". >> >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >>>>>>> /Anne >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's >> >> >>>>>> copyright >> >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> __________________________________________________ >> >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> >> >> Do You Yahoo!? >> >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com >
