Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-) We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list.
On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote: > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. > Thanks Joe and Daniel. > > Ethan > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> wrote: >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: >> >> >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ---- >>> From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>> >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure >>> though. >>> >>> Ethan >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at >>>> >>>> http://git.apache.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support >>>> for git. >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>> >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete >>>>> it >>>>> now. >>>>> Or is anyone still using it? >>>>> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out >>>>>> of svn. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the >>> trunk. >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. >>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe. >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some >>>>>>> Licensing >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits". >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's >>>>>>>>>>> copyright >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> __________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> __________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >> http://mail.yahoo.com >>
