Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability:
http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache ----- Original Message ---- > From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I > do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my > git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure > though. > > Ethan > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > > > > http://git.apache.org/ > > > > > > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > > if others use it, it makes sense to request support > > for git. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > >> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >> > >> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete > >> it > >> now. > >> Or is anyone still using it? > >> > >> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> > >> > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > >> > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > >> > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > >> > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > >> > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > >> > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > >> > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > >> > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > >> > of svn. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ----- Original Message ---- > >> >> From: Joe Schaefer > >> >> To: [email protected] > >> >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM > >> >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >> >> > >> >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends > >> >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files > >> >> need to be at the base directory of the package. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ---- > >> >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> >>> To: [email protected] > >> >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >> >>> > >> >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. > >> >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? > >> >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > >> >>> > >> >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the > trunk. > >> >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. > >> >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has > >> >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree > >> >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding > >> >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >> >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> >>>>> To: [email protected] > >> >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM > >> >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Thanks Joe. > >> >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >> >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM > >> >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some > >> >> Licensing > >> >>> > >> >>>>>>> Nits". > >> >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> /Anne > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's > >> >>>>>> copyright > >> >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> __________________________________________________ > >> >>>> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> __________________________________________________ > >> >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
