@anne: Thanks again for making these svn commits. woot! On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:55 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]>wrote:
> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > > http://git.apache.org/ > > > If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > if others use it, it makes sense to request support > for git. > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM > > Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > > > The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just delete > it > > now. > > Or is anyone still using it? > > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > > > > Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > > > are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > > > so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > > > github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > > > mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > > > The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > > > the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > > > user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > > > of svn. > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > >> From: Joe Schaefer > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM > > >> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >> > > >> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends > > >> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files > > >> need to be at the base directory of the package. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > >>> To: [email protected] > > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>> > > >>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. > > >>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? > > >>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > > >>> > > >>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to the > trunk. > > >>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. > > >>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has > > >>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree > > >>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding > > >>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > >>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM > > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>>>> > > >>>>> Thanks Joe. > > >>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM > > >>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Hi everyone, > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 "Some > > >> Licensing > > >>> > > >>>>>>> Nits". > > >>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> /Anne > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's > copyright > > >>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> __________________________________________________ > > >>>> Do You Yahoo!? > > >>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > >>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > > >> > > >> > > >> __________________________________________________ > > >> Do You Yahoo!? > > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
