+1 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]>wrote:
> Well at least we can't say ESME-47 was good for nothing ;-) > > We now have a NOTICE and a LICENSE file where they should be, learned that > we can use git-svn and met a lot of awesome people on our list. > > > On 27. jan. 2010, at 21.25, Ethan Jewett wrote: > > > Clearly I should Google before assuming something can't be done. > > Thanks Joe and Daniel. > > > > Ethan > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Joe Schaefer <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Jukka uses git-svn all the time for pushing commits to our svn > >> server. There's a wiki page which explains what you need to do > >> to the git mirrors to enable full svn interoperability: > >> > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache > >> > >> > >> > >> ----- Original Message ---- > >>> From: Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> > >>> To: [email protected] > >>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 3:13:16 PM > >>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>> > >>> Just for the record: Other developers *want* to use git (at least I > >>> do), but I only want to use git if I can push back upstream from my > >>> git repo, which I don't think you can do from a mirror. Not sure > >>> though. > >>> > >>> Ethan > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>>> What I'm talking about are the official mirrors at > >>>> > >>>> http://git.apache.org/ > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> If David was/is the only developer using git, then I > >>>> wouldn't bother with the infrastructure request. But > >>>> if others use it, it makes sense to request support > >>>> for git. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:50:56 PM > >>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>>>> > >>>>> The git mirror was something David set up, so I assume we can just > delete it > >>>>> now. > >>>>> Or is anyone still using it? > >>>>> > >>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.46, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Another thing I notice is a .gitignore file. If the devs > >>>>>> are using git-svn and would like to encourage others to do > >>>>>> so, it makes sense to request a git mirror from infrastructure. > >>>>>> github has an arrangement with Apache to sync from our git > >>>>>> mirrors every so often, so you pick up that benefit as well. > >>>>>> The win for me as a sysadmin is that the git mirrors do all > >>>>>> the history scraping once, and dishes it out to any interested > >>>>>> user, instead of each user scraping the history (slowly) out > >>>>>> of svn. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>>>> From: Joe Schaefer > >>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:34:59 PM > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Put the DISCLAIMER in trunk too I guess. It really depends > >>>>>>> on how ESME gets packaged up for release- all 3 of those files > >>>>>>> need to be at the base directory of the package. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:32:49 PM > >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Good we are getting this sorted out now. > >>>>>>>> I don't think we ever had a LICENSE file. It is this one I assume? > >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> I will do another commit now, where I add a LICENSE.txt file to > the > >>> trunk. > >>>>>>>> At the same time I will move the NOTICE file to the trunk as well. > >>>>>>>> What about the DISCLAIMER at the base? Should it stay where it is? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 20.25, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> The contents of the NOTICE file look perfect now. What has > >>>>>>>>> me wondering is why you put it at the base of the svn tree > >>>>>>>>> instead of inside trunk/. And where is the corresponding > >>>>>>>>> LICENSE file for ESME? NOTICE should be right next to that. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 2:10:28 PM > >>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks Joe. > >>>>>>>>>> Just committed the NOTICE file again now. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> On 27. jan. 2010, at 19.59, Joe Schaefer wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> ----- Original Message ---- > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Wed, January 27, 2010 1:15:22 PM > >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: ESME-47 "Some Licensing Nits" is now closed > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Just wanted to let everyone know that I just closed ESME-47 > "Some > >>>>>>> Licensing > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Nits". > >>>>>>>>>>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47 > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> A big thank you to everyone who has helped resolve this issue! > >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> /Anne > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Well done. Technically there should be a line for Apache's > copyright > >>>>>>>>>>> interest in ESME at the top of the NOTICE file as well, see > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> __________________________________________________ > >>>>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>>>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >>>>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> __________________________________________________ > >>>>>>> Do You Yahoo!? > >>>>>>> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >>>>>>> http://mail.yahoo.com > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > >> __________________________________________________ > >> Do You Yahoo!? > >> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > >> http://mail.yahoo.com > >> > >
