> dankseeds are shows that have been certified by a group > of etree'ers > (the danksters) who scrutinize the transfer of shows for a "perfect" > transfer.
I always get a chuckle when I see a text file with the powerful language: "dankseed certification given on xx/xx/2000" or whatever. Then the criteria that brother crow so aptly explains are listed. But why isn't there ever any discussion in the so-called "dankseed" process as to How the Tape Sounds? Admittedly, all of the criteria a tape must undergo to receive this "certification" is good stuff to take note of, but how can something be a "dankseed" without even a comment on the overall quality of the recording? It seems that you could have a tape from a rig that was set up in the bathroom of the club that might sound like crap but still pass the "dankseed certification process." I don't mean this as too much of a jab at the dankseed folks (I am 100% confident that they are trying to let people know that a "dankseed" can safely be downloaded as a good source), but I'd like to hear what they have to say about this. Pete | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chicago, Illinois www.InHiding.com _______________________________________________ etree mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://mail.etree.org/mailman/listinfo/etree
