On May 21, 2014, at 9:05 PM, EVDL Administrator via EV <[email protected]> 
wrote:

> On 21 May 2014 at 17:26, Mike Nickerson via EV wrote:
> 
>> If you start with fossil fuels, the efficiency is more balanced.  You lose
>> quite a bit of the energy in the generation plant, or the hydrogen
>> production and fuel cell, but it is about the same in both cases.
> 
> You may be right, though my observation has been that the calculations for 
> system efficiency are so complex that they're easily nudged to reach a 
> particular desired conclusion.  (I'm not saying that you're doing that here, 
> just that in general I don't fully trust these numbers.)
> 
> As I see it, one of an EV's major advantages is its ability to use 
> electrical energy produced from many different sources, including renewable 
> ones.

Same as with FCEVs.


>  
> 
> Storing energy from PVs and dumping it into an EV is actually reasonably 
> practical right now. You can do it by using the grid as a giant storage 
> battery with grid-intertie PV.  (A turnaround efficiency calculation for 
> grid intertie will be left as an exercise for the reader. ;-)
> 
> OTOH, it's much more of an enterprise to run an FCV (or even a modified 
> ICEV) on sunlight you harvest with your own PVs.  

Currently, yes. But this is an emerging tech. In the mid to long term, probably 
not.

> 
> OK, you COULD make H2 at home through electrolysis and compress it.  But 
> you'd need a lot of PV real estate, and a substantial quantity of extra 
> hardware.  
> 
> Now, if you're a fossil fuel extractor, this idea that vehicle users might 
> be able to make their own fuel is not a good thing.  Heck, you don't even 
> want people charging their EVs from hydropower or even coal-generated 
> electricity.  You want them to buy YOUR fuel.

> So, FCVs are exactly what you want. They're ZEVs, so they satisfy the CA 
> requirement (and any other legislative mandates in other lands).  However, 
> the users are effectively locked in to the same old model : go the the 
> filling station, pay the filling station money, repeat.   You keep 
> transportation dependent on fuels that the users purchase from you.  Their 
> money keeps flowing to you and your stockholders.


Who cares? You can do it either way.


> 
> It doesn't take much to see why FCVs are being pushed so hard in the media, 
> and I'm not even wearing a tinfoil hat.

Interesting. I see EVs as being pushed in the media. I see great stuff out 
there. That's the intent.


> 
> David Roden
> EVDL Administrator
> http://www.evdl.org/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
> (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to