On Jul 26, 2014, at 12:01 AM, Cor van de Water via EV <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ben, you are right. *if* you can find a 6:1 rear end
> (the highest that my vehicle can be equipped with is 4.2:1)

The car has an 8" rear end, which will go up (down) to 4.11. There's a shop in 
town that'll build a custom 9" rear end with 6:1, but it wouldn't be cheap.

> then at 12.65 MPH the drive shaft is doing 1000 RPM.
> Just a random data point: my previous truck (S10) when doing
> a constant 55 MPH on level road, no wind, consumed 15 kW to
> maintain the same speed.
> Scaling that down to 1/4 of the speed: 14 MPH should take way less
> than 4 kW since the wind resistance is not linear (I believe it is 4th
> power of speed) so 5 hp at 1000 RPM is a good continuous power rating,
> as long
> as the higher RPM rating is equally higher.

Then I think I'm probably okay with a pair of AC-51s and a 4.11 rear. Power in 
the AC-51 increases linearly with speed at slightly greater than unity: 5 @ 
1000, 13 @ 2000, 22 @ 3000, 31 @ 4000, 40 @ 5000 45 @ 6000, and then back down 
to 40 @ 7000. (Those're all from eyeballing the graph, so not exact.)

If an S10 needs 15 hp (and I'm freely interchanging hp and kW to make the math 
easy) at 55 MPH, the Mustang shouldn't need *much* more than that -- and I'd 
place my bets on it needing less. At 55 MPH with the 4.11 is 3000 RPM; with a 
single AC-51, that's 22 hp. The single motor would be okay, but it might not be 
happy climbing hills -- not that we have many in town here, but Sedona and 
Flagstaff and the Grand Canyon and lots more are only a half a day away.

At the slow end...1000 RPM is ~19 MPH. Five horsepower might not cut it by 
itself, and 15 MPH school zones might be a problem -- with a single motor. But 
doubled with a second motor it should (I think) be fine. 500 RPM is at ~10 MPH, 
and the two motors, I'm guessing, should still be capable of 5 hp combined.

Intuitively, it works...I'd think five flesh-and-blood mustangs would have a 
hard time pulling the car to 20 MPH, but ten of them should be fine -- it'd be 
like carrying two riders at a gallop. Couldn't keep it up all day and would 
need a good rubdown afterwards, but definitely doable.

At 6000 RPM where power peaks, it's 110 MPH -- more than enough speed, at least 
without handling upgrades and perhaps an upgraded driver. Plus, those types of 
speeds would presumably be in hybrid mode anyway if 90 hp isn't enough.

> The saving grace for EVs is that the "continuous" trip is almost always
> less than an hour (Tesla excluded) so you can typically look at 1/2 hour
> rating of compnents such as motors and those are way higher than 24/7
> continuous ratings.

Indeed, the car is going to have a battery in the 10 - 20 kWh range. Anything 
much over half an hour on the road would be in hybrid mode. Still, I'd rather 
not burn up the motor early by constantly stressing it.

Seems like throwing a pair of motors at the car does, indeed, solve the gearing 
problem, and a second AC-51 is definitely cheaper than the custom transmission 
and not that much more expensive than a custom rear end. That it would give 
very characteristic "Mustangy" performance (to use David's term) is good; I'd 
rather spend less money and have more power than spend more money and have less 
power!

Also, now that I understand this a lot better, I'm going to re-run a bunch of 
those battery calculations. I might be able to shave off some of the Ah specs 
if I assume that the system as an whole doesn't need more than 1000 A rounded 
up for a bit of overhead for age / temperature / whatever.

Thanks again,

b&
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20140726/13e221b1/attachment.pgp>
_______________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
For EV drag racing discussion, please use NEDRA 
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NEDRA)

Reply via email to