Sums it up nicely with incorrect information?

- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Aug 23, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Alan Arrison via EV <ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> 
> Enough with the hydrogen, Peter sums it up nicely.
> 
>> On 8/23/2021 7:27 PM, Peter VanDerWal via EV wrote:
>> I thought it was obvious I was comparing BEV vs FCEV.  Apparently not.
>> 
>>> Higher cost to build? Well, yeah. But don’t BEVs cost more to build,
>> An FCEV is an EV with a fuel cell, so most of the extra BEV costs are still 
>> there (still needs an electric motor/controller/batteries/etc)
>> You say a little by using a smaller battery pack but then spend a LOT more 
>> of the fuel cell, tank(s), etc.
>> 
>>> Higher cost to operate. For the consumer? Really?
>> Compared to an BEV?  Yes, absolutely, much higher.  It gets even worse if 
>> you use green H2 since it requires about 3-4x as much electricity per mile 
>> to make the H2 vs charging an EV.
>> 
>>> Lower efficiency. Lower efficiency of what, and to whom?
>> Miles per kWh.  To EVERYONE.
>> Modern LiIon batteries are about 90% efficient at storing energy, chargers 
>> are also around 90%, equaling roughly 80% efficient at stroing electricity 
>> (and that can be improved)
>> Modern electrolyzers are around 80-85% efficient and fuel cells are around 
>> 60%, which means a combined efficiency of ~50%, and that does NOT count any 
>> energy used to compress the H2, which front what I've read brings the total 
>> storage efficiency down to around 25-30%...at best.  You'll also have 
>> additional losses charging/discharging the batteries on the FCEV.
>> 
>>> No existing infrastructure. Again, this all depends. If you have access to 
>>> a station and 5 minutes
>>> to fill every 300 miles or so, that’s plenty .
>> Currently there are less than 40 public H2 stations around LA.  There are 
>> zero H2 stations anywhere else in the USA.
>> Currently, in the USA, there are over 1,000 public charging stations for 
>> every public H2 station.  This number is increasing because while they are 
>> constantly installing new EV charging stations, they are shutting down H2 
>> stations.
>> For all intents and purposes, there is NO H2 fueling infrastructure in the 
>> USA, while Public EV charging stations are becoming common acrost most of 
>> the USA.  Extremely common on the coasts.
>> 
>> As stated above, if you are cracking water for you FCEV, then it takes 3-4x 
>> as much electricity per mile to charge at home (compared to a BEV)
>> 
>> The weight of modern FCEV is roughly the same as the weight of comparable 
>> BEVs, so that's not an advantage to either.
>> 
>> They have EVs available today that can recharge almost as fast as refueling 
>> a FCEV, and you can hook up the charge cord yourself, from what I've read 
>> every H2 fueling station requires a trained individual to connect the hose.  
>> Waiting for him/her to show up could elliminate the remaining time advantage.
>> 
>> Consumers won't purchase FCEV unless they perceive and advantage TO THEM.
>> Let me put it simply, what advantages do YOU see to ANYONE other than the 
>> folks that make H2?
>> How do you see these advantages making FCEV economically viable?
>> Viable enough to justify creating a nation wide H2 fueling infracstructure 
>> from scratch?
>> _______________________________________________
>> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> _______________________________________________
> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 

_______________________________________________
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to