A number of things to correct here:

- Availability dates: 

Well, a history lesson for you….technically, yes, Honda did start producing an 
FCX Clarity in 2008 in Japan, and first available there. However, this was 
essentially a run of demo vehicles with a very limited number of people that 
were given them to try. Some key influencers got them, like several well-known 
actresses. I tried, but was unable to get one. 

The first real availability of a fuel cell car in any number was one offered by 
Hyundai. I was at the event giving the first set of keys to a family in Orange 
County. I think it was in August of 2014. I have pictures, so can dig up the 
exact date if anyone is really interested. 

Several months later, Toyota released its Mirai, in Japan only. (This is all 
off the top of my head, so I may be off a little.) In the fall of 2015, the 
Mirai was made available in California. I bought one of those in October - it 
was one of the first off the line. I also obtained an early Clarity Fuel cell, 
the first really by Honda with widespread availability, in March, 2017. 

So no, fuel cells weren’t available to the general public until 2014. 

There was long wait lists, so they didn’t really start hitting the road for 
awhile.

On the BEV side, you’re forgetting the RAV4-EV in 1997, I think, and the EV1 
about that time, too, and Honda also had one. 

Of the EVs you mentioned, really only the Tesla was comparable. I tried 
unsuccessfully to get a FIT EV, and that was a great car, but not car able to 
the FCEVs. And yes, the EVs outsold the FCEVs in 2012, in part because you 
could not buy a FCEV! 

In fact, it you look at sales numbers in California, they were outsold every 
year. However, it you compare the adoption curve for the EV with the FCEV, the 
curve is the same for the two, just later by seven years. I consider that 
remarkable given the limits in infrastructure and other challenges.

Fueling stations - I hadn’t noticed that you got the number of stations wrong, 
only that you said they were closing. But your comment about only five opening 
since 2017 is way off. I think that at least five have already opened just this 
year.

Lastly, you equate cost of production with cost to the consumer. Yes, that’s 
part of it, but it’s much more complicated than that. That’s for both BEV and 
FCEV. For years, cost to Tesla owners for using super chargers was zero. And 
right now it is zero for FCEV owners. However, whatever the price has been and 
the cost to produce, both prices and costs are dropping.
 The important price comparison IMHO is with the price of gasoline and diesel.


- Mark

Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone

> On Aug 23, 2021, at 8:43 PM, Peter VanDerWal via EV <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> FCEV have been available in California since 2008, that's nearly as as 
> modern EVs.
> 
> The Tesla S came out in 2012, at that time there were at least 8 other EVs 
> for sale in the USA.
> Ford Focus EV($39,995), Ford Transit Connect($58,000), Misubishi 
> i-Miev($27,900), Honda Fit EV($36,665), Nissan Leaf ($35,200), Wheego LiFe 
> ($32,995), Toyota RAV4 EV ($49,800), and the Coda sedan ($37,250)
> Granted most were only available in California and in limited qunatities, 
> although most (if not all) out sold FCEVs in California in 2012.
> 
> My mistake about the number of H2 fueling stations, I hadn't looked this up 
> since 2017, apparently they built 5 new stations since then.
> Of course in that same time frame they installed ~30,000 public charging 
> stations.
> They might open 1-2 new H2 stations in the next year or so.  They have opened 
> ~17,000 public EV charging stations in the last year (During COVID!!).
> The rate they are opening public chargin stations is accelerating.  At the 
> rate they are currently building H2 stations, it will take them 50 years to 
> build as many H2 stations as the number of public EV charging stations that 
> will open tomorrow.
> Clearly H2 infrastructure is catching up [rolls eyes]
> 
> I'll grant you that consumers, in general, don't care about effeciency, but 
> they do care about costs. 
> If H2 is made using electricity and it requires 4x as much electricity per 
> mile, then the cost to the consumer will be at least 4 times as much, plus 
> markup.
> Even when using public charging stations, that typically csot 2x-3x as much 
> as charging at home, H2 currently cost 2-3x as much per mile, which makes it 
> 5-10x as much as charging at home.
> Of course, myself and many others on this list, have solar panels at home 
> which makes fuel cost per mile effective zero (my panels paid for themselves 
> years ago)
> 
> When comparing weight, I ment vehicles with similar capabilities, not similar 
> names.  
> The closest EV (capability wise) to the Honda Clarity is the Tesla Model 3 
> long range, they have similar passenger volume, simlar cargo volume, similar 
> range and similar weight.  
> The Tesla weighs 120 lbs more (~3% heavier), 7 miles less EPA range (2%), 5% 
> less passenger volume (the tesla has more head room front and back and more 
> front leg room, but less rear legroom), and the tesla has 5% more cargo 
> volume.
> 
> My PGP public key: https://vanderwal.us/evdl_pgp.key
> 
> August 23, 2021 5:52 PM, "Mark Abramowitz via EV" <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> A few responses:
>> 
>> FCEVs are certainly earlier stage than EVs. Costs are coming down quickly. 
>> But to the consumer,
>> FCEVs aren’t necessary more expensive. For the cost of a Tesla S, the only 
>> one out when I bought my
>> first FCEV, I could buy at least two FCEVs, taking into account factory and 
>> other incentives.
>> 
>> Currently, are they more expensive? I don’t know. Taking into account 
>> infrastructure, particularly
>> at scale, FCEVs are cheaper. To a consumer, only if they need to put in 
>> charging or fueling
>> infrastructure.
>> 
>> Cost to operate - you give no costs, only efficiency numbers. fCEV owners 
>> pay no nothing for fuel
>> for the first three years. If they lease, nothing. We own one, and lease 
>> one. If you own, after the
>> first three years, it’s VERY expensive, though costs are coming down. 
>> Maintenance is part of cost
>> to own. Some manufacturers include it, some don’t. 
>> 

_______________________________________________
Address messages to [email protected]
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Reply via email to