Le 18-août-06, à 17:02, 1Z a écrit :
> It is for Pythagorenas and Platonists to explain what they mean by > "exist". > > However, if you are going to claim that we are actually *in* Platonia, > (mathematical monism) there must be some equivalence between the > existence we > have and the existence numbers have. Of course! But that is what I am currently explaining. If you have follow the UDA, then, even if you could not yet be completely convinced by each steps, you should at least be able to figure out in which sense "you", here and now, in the "shape" of an OM, to borrow the list vocabulary, exist as a relative number. Third personally you exist in aleph-zero relative number form (like snapshots of a running program). First personally you exist in the same shape (although you cannot know that) but you are "multiplied" by a continuum: the computational histories generated by the UD, in the mathematical sense, going through those third person states. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
