Le 09-oct.-06, à 23:56, Colin Geoffrey Hales a écrit :


> ...But it's not. Lets talk about the object with this property of five 
> in
> platonia as <5>. Here in reality what we are doing is creating a label 
> I
> and interpreting the label as a pointer to storage where the value in 
> the
> storage (call it [I])  is not an integer, but a symbolic 
> representation of
> property of five_ness as mapped from platonia to reality. What we are
> doing is (very very metaphorically) shining a light (of an infinity of
> possible numbers) on the object <5> in platonia and letting the 
> reflected
> light inhabit [I]. We behave as if <5> was in there, but it's not.



I think you are reifying number, or, put in another way, you put much 
more in "platonia" than I am using in both the UDA and the AUDA (the 
arithmetical UDA alias the interview of the lobian machine). Some 
people makes confusion here.

All I say is that a reasoner is platonist if he believes, about 
*arithmetical* propositions, in the principle of excluded middle. 
Equivalently he believes that if you execute a program P, then either 
the program stop or the program does not stop.

I don't believe at all that the number 5 is somewhere "there" in any 
sense you would give to "where" or "there".
I do believe that 5 is equal to 1+1+1+1+1, and that for any natural 
number N either  N is a multiple of 5 or it is not. So platonism is 
just in opposition to ultra-intuitionnism. We know since Godel that 
about numbers and arithmetic, intuitionnism is just a terminological 
variant of platonism (where a platonist says (A or ~A), an 
intuitionnist will say ~~(A or ~A), etc.

"My" Platonism is the explicit or implicit standard platonism of most 
working mathematicians.

Bruno




http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to