since BHs are figments of Hawkins' et al. imagination
for 'something there  must be', we can 'imagine' that
something so as to bounce back those photons (you
believe in) INSIDE once they got in and this is the
reason why the darn blob is  black. 
Imagination should not be constrained to imagined
reality. MAke it so that it fits.
(Hungarian proverb: Once it's goose, it should be
--- James N Rose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Conjecture:
> "Blackholes imply 'C' is violated/invalidated."
> Notion:  If the Speed of Light is not just a 
> fixed constant but a fixed maxima, then, if Newton's
> 3 Laws of Inertia are to be maintained, especially
> regarding 'equal & opposite' ...
> the current depiction of blackholes being able to
> constrain photons 100% infers that any random photon
> moving directly outward from the center-locus of a
> singularity can only be kept from forward linear
> motion 
> by a force not just equal to, but necessarily
> greater 
> than, its vector moment - presumed to be "C".
> If only just '-C', then Probability would require
> blackholes be never 'black', but accumulatively
> brilliant white - unless - 'C' is out-maximummed.
> Or, the model has an error - and the dynamics of
> light restriction/containment are of a wholly 
> different nature than currently presumed.
> Comments?
> Jamie Rose
> Ceptual Institute

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to