Hi John:

I think the idea before was to provide an acronym 
list and also give each person or like minded 
group a limit of a few pages in the FAQ document 
in which to present a summary of their point of view.

Hal Ruhl

At 11:59 AM 2/7/2007, you wrote:
>Hal:
>you really believe that anybody could provide 
>responses acceptable for all others? (I did not say understandable")
>Everybody sits in his own mindset and speaks his 
>own scientific religion (=scientific belief 
>system) - [said so, whether I aggraveted  now (again) Russell or not.]
>We are in a pretty liquid exchange-state (liquid OM).
>Otherwise the idea is excellent, with multiple choice.
>John
>----- Original Message -----
>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hal Ruhl
>To: <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>everything-list@googlegroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:49 PM
>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds
>
>Hi John:
>
>Long ago there was some effort to write a FAQ 
>for the list.  Perhaps we should give it another try.
>
>Hal Ruhl
>
>
>
>
>At 11:30 AM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
>>Hal and list:
>>I do not think anybody "fully understands" what 
>>other listers write, even if one thinks so.
>>Or is it only my handicap?
>>John M
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hal Ruhl
>>To: 
>><mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>everything-list@googlegroups.com
>>Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:24 PM
>>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds
>>
>>Hi Bruno:
>>I do not think I fully understand what you are saying.
>>Suppose your model bans white rabbits from its
>>evolving universes - meaning I take it that all
>>successive states are fully logical consequences of their prior state.
>>I would see this as a selection of one possibility from two.
>>Lets us say that you are correct about this
>>result re your model, this just seems to
>>reinforce the idea that it is a sub set in order
>>to avoid the information generating selection in the full set.
>>Yours
>>Hal Ruhl
>>
>>At 11:30 AM 2/5/2007, you wrote:
>>
>> >Le 05-févr.-07, à 00:46, Hal Ruhl a écrit :
>> >
>> > >  As far as I can tell from this, my model may include Bruno's model as
>> > > a subset.
>> >
>> >
>> >This means that even if "my theory" makes disappear all (1-person)
>> >white rabbits, you will still have to justify that your overset does
>> >not reintroduce new one.
>> >
>> >Bruno
>> >
>> >
>> > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>----------
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 
>- Release Date: 2/6/2007 5:52 PM
>
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to