Hi John: I think the idea before was to provide an acronym list and also give each person or like minded group a limit of a few pages in the FAQ document in which to present a summary of their point of view.
Hal Ruhl At 11:59 AM 2/7/2007, you wrote: >Hal: >you really believe that anybody could provide >responses acceptable for all others? (I did not say understandable") >Everybody sits in his own mindset and speaks his >own scientific religion (=scientific belief >system) - [said so, whether I aggraveted now (again) Russell or not.] >We are in a pretty liquid exchange-state (liquid OM). >Otherwise the idea is excellent, with multiple choice. >John >----- Original Message ----- >From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hal Ruhl >To: <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>everything-list@googlegroups.com >Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:49 PM >Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds > >Hi John: > >Long ago there was some effort to write a FAQ >for the list. Perhaps we should give it another try. > >Hal Ruhl > > > > >At 11:30 AM 2/6/2007, you wrote: >>Hal and list: >>I do not think anybody "fully understands" what >>other listers write, even if one thinks so. >>Or is it only my handicap? >>John M >>----- Original Message ----- >>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Hal Ruhl >>To: >><mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>everything-list@googlegroups.com >>Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:24 PM >>Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds >> >>Hi Bruno: >>I do not think I fully understand what you are saying. >>Suppose your model bans white rabbits from its >>evolving universes - meaning I take it that all >>successive states are fully logical consequences of their prior state. >>I would see this as a selection of one possibility from two. >>Lets us say that you are correct about this >>result re your model, this just seems to >>reinforce the idea that it is a sub set in order >>to avoid the information generating selection in the full set. >>Yours >>Hal Ruhl >> >>At 11:30 AM 2/5/2007, you wrote: >> >> >Le 05-févr.-07, à 00:46, Hal Ruhl a écrit : >> > >> > > As far as I can tell from this, my model may include Bruno's model as >> > > a subset. >> > >> > >> >This means that even if "my theory" makes disappear all (1-person) >> >white rabbits, you will still have to justify that your overset does >> >not reintroduce new one. >> > >> >Bruno >> > >> > >> > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ >> > >> > >> > >> > > >---------- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 >- Release Date: 2/6/2007 5:52 PM > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---