Hi, Hal: and you really think there would be an end? Look at this list with allegedly like-minded chaps and no end of picking on 'everything'. Include "like-minded" lists - meaning 'unlike' really - and the internet would fill up. Does it make a difference to argue here, or at another site? Our (meaning the potential scientific crowd) views are so diversified (what a nice expression for 'underdeveloped') with diverse angles to look at it FROM, that a wider agreement is IMO hopeless. Even with the reason of 'a' George Levy's clarity. I introduced this list to a friend from another list (complexity) who is math-phys minded and his refusal came: these guys are 'too' Platonistic for me. I think Jason's idea is great, if he can do it we will have a maybe wider sortiment of ideas, I doubt a possibility of crystallized-out agreed upon identifications. But I am a skeptic. Best regards John
On 2/7/07, Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi John: > > I think the idea before was to provide an acronym list and also give each > person or like minded group a limit of a few pages in the FAQ document in > which to present a summary of their point of view. > > Hal Ruhl > > At 11:59 AM 2/7/2007, you wrote: > > Hal: > you really believe that anybody could provide responses acceptable for all > others? (I did not say understandable") > Everybody sits in his own mindset and speaks his own scientific religion > (=scientific belief system) - [said so, whether I aggraveted now (again) > Russell or not.] > We are in a pretty liquid exchange-state (liquid OM). > Otherwise the idea is excellent, with multiple choice. > John > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Hal Ruhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: everything-list@googlegroups.com > Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 8:49 PM > Subject: Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds > > Hi John: > > Long ago there was some effort to write a FAQ for the list. Perhaps we > should give it another try. > > Hal Ruhl > > > > > At 11:30 AM 2/6/2007, you wrote: > > Hal and list: > I do not think anybody "fully understands" what other listers write, even > if one thinks so. > Or is it only my handicap? > John M ----- Original Message ----- From: Hal Ruhl<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: > everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 10:24 PM > Subject: > Re: ASSA and Many-Worlds > > Hi Bruno: > I do not think I fully understand what you are saying. > Suppose your model bans white rabbits from its evolving universes - > meaning I take it that all successive states are fully logical > consequences of their prior state. > I would see this as a selection of one possibility from two. > Lets us say that you are correct about this result re your model, this > just seems to reinforce the idea that it is a sub set in order to avoid > the information generating selection in the full set. > Yours > Hal Ruhl > > At 11:30 AM 2/5/2007, you wrote: > > >Le 05-févr.-07, à 00:46, Hal Ruhl a écrit : > > > As far as I can tell > from this, my model may include Bruno's model as > > a subset. > > >This > means that even if "my theory" makes disappear all (1-person) >white > rabbits, you will still have to justify that your overset does >not > reintroduce new one. > >Bruno > > > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/<http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/%7Emarchal/> > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.29/673 - Release Date: 2/6/2007 > 5:52 PM > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---