Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> On 01/06/07, *Torgny Tholerus* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> Stathis Papaioannou skrev:
>> On 01/06/07, *Torgny Tholerus* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>> I behave AS IF I am conscious because the natural selection
>> has favored that type of behavior.
>> Which implies you really are conscious, because otherwise why
>> would evolution have gone to the trouble of making *me* conscious
>> if it could have got away without it?
> It did got away without it... ;-)
> I assure you, at least one entity in the universe is conscious: me. If
> evolution could have made me a zombie, it would have. Therefore, it
> seems reasonable to assume that evolution couldn't help but grant me
> consciousness as a side-effect or epiphenomenon, the real prize being
> intelligent behaviour. There are some philosophers (eg. Daniel Dennett)
> who would argue that consciousness is *nothing but* this intelligent
> behaviour, and the idea of a zombie is logically incoherent, but I'm not
> entirely convinced that this is right.
> Stathis Papaioannou
I'm with Dennett, except that I think logic is to weak a tool to rule out
zombies. It would require proving a contradiction from "X acts like a
conscious human" and "X is not conscious". But all you really need is to show
it's nomologically impossible - i.e. would imply a violation of presumed
scientific knowledge. I think that may be possible.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at