On Jun 1, 2007, at 6:53 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> I assure you, at least one entity in the universe is conscious: me.  
> If evolution could have made me a zombie, it would have. Therefore,  
> it seems reasonable to assume that evolution couldn't help but  
> grant me consciousness as a side-effect or epiphenomenon, the real  
> prize being intelligent behaviour. <snip>

I'm with Dennett too, and I'll bring up the point he made about this  
"epiphenomenon" view of consciousness that keeps cropping up. The  
point is that whatever consciousness is, it >cannot< be  
"epiphenomenal" in the philosophical sense of "having no physical  
effects". I'll put it this way: your hands and fingers are physical  
objects. When they move, that is a physical event. Whatever causes  
them to move, is also a physical event. When you type the words "I am  
conscious", that is also a physical event. If you think that your  
consciousness is epiphenomenal, you must believe that your being  
conscious has >nothing whatever< to do with your typing the words "I  
am conscious". It's just a coincidence! The same goes for whatever  
makes you >say< "I am conscious". If you really think consciousness  
is epiphenomenal, you must endorse something like this:
"I know I'm conscious (for whatever reason). And, for some totally  
unrelated reasons having nothing whatever to do with the fact that  
I'm conscious, I also >say< that I'm conscious."

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to